McMahon talks about what defines today's stars

In an interview with WWE Magazine, Vince McMahon gives his thoughts on what defines today's WWE Superstars. Using the massive Warlord as an example, McMahon says bigger is not necessarily better in today's WWE.

What defines today's top Superstars?

Vince McMahon: It's everything that people don't see. It's easy to say from a visual standpoint that bigger is better in reference to past eras of WWF. But take The Warlord, for example. He was enormous — one of the most visually impressive Superstars we've had — but he couldn't sell five tickets. He had no charisma, no "gift of gab," which is what really sets apart today's Superstars, even if they may not be as physically intimidating. Someone like CM Punk, even though he's a good-looking guy, isn't built like that. He probably weighs less than I do. But today's fans are drawn to his confidence and charisma. Those are the things a Superstar exudes, and they translate though the television set.

Then how do you explain Batista?

Tjioxz wrote:

Then how do you explain Batista?

Great Question...


At least Vince is high on CM Punk.. About fucking time

^ erm three time world champ, already a triple crown champ, won all three titles for said triple crown within three months, back to back MITB winner, ECW champ a year after debuting....HOW wasnt he high on him to begin with

they werent high on Punk back then because of his attitude, he had a bad one at the time

^ Oh did he...well his achievements in such a short time didnt feel like he was unhigh

i loves queston bout batista i agre with mr. mcman bout what defines todays stars