Why does there always have to be a feud?

When was the last time you saw a match in WWE that was not part of an angle or a continuation of a story? Can they just match some wrestlers up and have a good wrestling match every now and again without a dusty finish or 5 countered finishing move's.

It's always best to have a feud because it makes it better rather than having random matches out of nowhere, the crowd may not give a shit. Some superstars need to get built up to get the crowd to notice them like they're trying with Sheamus now.

Vee//Venom wrote:

If there's no fueds the creative department would sit on their asses most of the day and do nothing.

That's true too though it seems they do that already with Raw

The fued/storyline is there to keep people interested. It makes you wonder what will be the next stage (unless you someone who has the insane ability to find all and every spoiler) rather than watching a match that means nothing.

Hey Blue, there's a show called WWE Superstars that does that.....most of the time....

Because that's what WWE is you know. It's not JUST wrestling, they have to have a soap opera storyline to take up 90% of the show. Seriously, how many matches do they even have now? They're to busy flapping their lips.