Undertaker/Kane Plans Very Long Feud Expected.

The Wrestling Observer is reporting that the current creative plan in WWE is to have The Undertaker feud with Kane over the next several months. It's being said that at this point, matches between the two stars are penciled in for the Night of Champions PPV and the Hell in a Cell PPV. Undertaker vs. Kane has also been booked for WWE's MSG house show on September 25th.

How sad that past storylines have to be rehashed over and OVER especially with the same guys...*facepalm*

I actually like this one the most, because it isn't the constant turning on eachother. Kane's promo this week stated that his fued with Taker at WM21 he realized "he wasn't ready." And now he believes he is ready.

IMO its perfect, and ties up EVERYTHING.

It was WM20, Triple X. lol (Taker vs Orton @21)

I actually like what they've done with this so far too. From the time when his character was introduced back when Paul Bearer was doing those epic promos back in 97, the basis of this feud was Kane's hatrid for Taker setting him on fire and being the favorite son. When they changed things a little some years ago making Paul not Kane's father anymore (or not acknowledging it anyway) and just saying that their parents died in the fire, the basis of the feud was still the same: Kane was always second fiddle to Taker and Kane's distain for the Deadman.

So seeing as how they want to once more have another Taker/Kane feud, it's only fitting that they base everything around Kane's distain for Taker.

Sadly... very few have ever been put over in a feud against Taker (Tnx CP for that thread) which would indicate that Kane will fall to Taker just like the last three times!

I love this feud, Its going to be EPIC. I want to see a buried alive match and a hitc with them two and with some blood but problem is they wont give us blood.

They should keep this fued going to WM XXVII. Have them trade PPV victories over the next few months but before Elimination Chamber Undertaker beats Kane to qualify for the World Title EC match (Kane would have dropped the title by then). Undertaker would look set to win when Kane comes in and interferes, costing Taker the match. On the next SD!, Undertaker would tell Kane and the WWE Universe that he's done, he doesn't want to fight Kane anymore, he doesn't even want to fight anymore. Kane goads him into a match over the next few weeks, which Undertaker accepts. Undertaker beats Kane at WM but states that he doesn't want to fight Kane anymore and that he's gonna just walk away. Undertaker's druids bring out a coffin which Undertaker gets into. The lid is closed and that is the last we see of the Undertaker.

Who likes this idea?

10th Wonder of the World wrote:

It was WM20, Triple X. lol (Taker vs Orton @21)

I actually like what they've done with this so far too. From the time when his character was introduced back when Paul Bearer was doing those epic promos back in 97, the basis of this feud was Kane's hatrid for Taker setting him on fire and being the favorite son. When they changed things a little some years ago making Paul not Kane's father anymore (or not acknowledging it anyway) and just saying that their parents died in the fire, the basis of the feud was still the same: Kane was always second fiddle to Taker and Kane's distain for the Deadman.

So seeing as how they want to once more have another Taker/Kane feud, it's only fitting that they base everything around Kane's distain for Taker.

Sadly... very few have ever been put over in a feud against Taker (Tnx CP for that thread) which would indicate that Kane will fall to Taker just like the last three times!

to be fair, Kane was supposed to go over Taker the times at Mania, but Kane turned them down

i really like that idea VLG
i personally think it should last til WM

the perfect way i could think of doing it is havin Taker get buried alive, and then be off screen for a few more months...rest up and then return...but then i remembered thats already happened

but Kane v Taker would be the perfect way to finish both careers...as both as suppoedly due to retire

either way i pray Taker doesnt squash him like he practically did the other 2 times

Kane has been over due this push..and has yet to unimpress me, his promos have been golden some of the best in years...and he has even had some decent matches with midget cripples like Rey Rey

Taker didnt...squash him. Kane was supposed to go over Taker BOTH TIMES but KANE turned them down. how is that a squash when one guy doesnt want to beat someone else?

Dead wrote:

10th Wonder of the World wrote:

It was WM20, Triple X. lol (Taker vs Orton @21)

I actually like what they've done with this so far too. From the time when his character was introduced back when Paul Bearer was doing those epic promos back in 97, the basis of this feud was Kane's hatrid for Taker setting him on fire and being the favorite son. When they changed things a little some years ago making Paul not Kane's father anymore (or not acknowledging it anyway) and just saying that their parents died in the fire, the basis of the feud was still the same: Kane was always second fiddle to Taker and Kane's distain for the Deadman.

So seeing as how they want to once more have another Taker/Kane feud, it's only fitting that they base everything around Kane's distain for Taker.

Sadly... very few have ever been put over in a feud against Taker (Tnx CP for that thread) which would indicate that Kane will fall to Taker just like the last three times!

to be fair, Kane was supposed to go over Taker the times at Mania, but Kane turned them down

I'm aware of that, but just in the aspect of what I root to see to happen, it's kinda disappointing. I know peeps decline to win at big events against him, but it'd be nice to see SOMEONE beat him.

Make sense?

he chose to not go over him at WM....but Kane and Taker have had plenty of matches....and i think i can only remember one time Kane has beat Taker cleanly...im not even sure that was clean.

so maybe not squash..but Taker has damn sure dominated both their fueds
which is why im preferring this one...cos Kane atm at least looks dominant...prolly wont last too long, once Taker is back in "shape" he will more then likely dominate again

The LL Father wrote:

he chose to not go over him at WM....but Kane and Taker have had plenty of matches....and i think i can only remember one time Kane has beat Taker cleanly...im not even sure that was clean.

so maybe not squash..but Taker has damn sure dominated both their fueds
which is why im preferring this one...cos Kane atm at least looks dominant...prolly wont last too long, once Taker is back in "shape" he will more then likely dominate again

WM14

Inferno Match

Summerslam 2000 or 2001

WM20

Some other matches in between.

the one match i know Kane won, was when he beat Taker to be number one contendor to the WWF title

The LL Father wrote:

the one match i know Kane won, was when he beat Taker to be number one contendor to the WWF title

Was this the time when they faced on Raw and Austin was champ at the time?

yeah. it was after that Kane won the title and lost it 24 hours later

That was so pointless placing the belt on him.