What If You Had the Power to Make a Finer World...

Would you use it? And if you did, how?

Its impossible to make a finer world because the people on this world cannot be controlled. People created their environment, so the world has been made to the standard of the people who live on it.

I asked if you HAD the power to do so, not stating how it is. If I wanted to know that, I'd simply talk to myself in the gotdamn mirror.

Your missing his whole point. Watch Angel if you don't believe me. Having the power to change the world is taking away people's free will to change it themselves/or be how they made themselves to be.

Realizes how practical this is, yet, it's only a hypothetical question*

Help reduce crime.
Cures for seriously life-threatening diseases.
Rid of corrupt government officials
Provide financial stability and better quality of living for those living in poverty.

Vengenz wrote:

I'd restore all the harm fucking humans did to the earth.

So you'd get rid of humans altogether then? That's probably the only way to make the world a perfect place tbh.

Rated X Superstar wrote:

Your missing his whole point. Watch Angel if you don't believe me. Having the power to change the world is taking away people's free will to change it themselves/or be how they made themselves to be.

I'm not missing shit, you're missing mine. I asked a stupid question not meant to be taken that seriously and looked at cynically. Too much to ask for, right?

Jordan H. wrote:

Rated X Superstar wrote:

Your missing his whole point. Watch Angel if you don't believe me. Having the power to change the world is taking away people's free will to change it themselves/or be how they made themselves to be.

I'm not missing shit, you're missing mine. I asked a stupid question not meant to be taken that seriously and looked at cynically. Too much to ask for, right?

I took a literal view on things, with no cynical intentions.

I'd make everyone look like me, then the world would be a much prettier place! I'd also terminate obese people.

VLG. wrote:

Jordan H. wrote:

Rated X Superstar wrote:

Your missing his whole point. Watch Angel if you don't believe me. Having the power to change the world is taking away people's free will to change it themselves/or be how they made themselves to be.

I'm not missing shit, you're missing mine. I asked a stupid question not meant to be taken that seriously and looked at cynically. Too much to ask for, right?

I took a literal view on things, with no cynical intentions.

Then why bother posting when you weren't going to answer the question?

My thing is this, I completely understood what the question was about and everything. What I'm confused on is the reaction it got. There's a bunch of crazier question that have been asked here, and they've got plenty of responses, I've seen people talking about what cartoon characters they'd fuck. So what was it about this question that got some people upset or annoyed?

Because it was Jordan H who asked it.

Jordan H. wrote:

VLG. wrote:

Jordan H. wrote:

Rated X Superstar wrote:

Your missing his whole point. Watch Angel if you don't believe me. Having the power to change the world is taking away people's free will to change it themselves/or be how they made themselves to be.

I'm not missing shit, you're missing mine. I asked a stupid question not meant to be taken that seriously and looked at cynically. Too much to ask for, right?

I took a literal view on things, with no cynical intentions.

Then why bother posting when you weren't going to answer the question?

I did answer the question. Just not in the way you wanted. And if I didn't give that answer you'd be having this conversation with someone else, because someone else would haev probably given then answer.

Forgive me for being a realist.

So you're admitting that you 'answered' the question but purposely did in a way that was going to cause trouble then excuse it by saying someone else would've if you didn't?

My Bitch, Dora! wrote:

My thing is this, I completely understood what the question was about and everything. What I'm confused on is the reaction it got. There's a bunch of crazier question that have been asked here, and they've got plenty of responses, I've seen people talking about what cartoon characters they'd fuck. So what was it about this question that got some people upset or annoyed?

I can remember quite a few of those threads.

Jordan H. wrote:

So you're admitting that you 'answered' the question but purposely did in a way that was going to cause trouble then excuse it by saying someone else would've if you didn't?

No. I had no intention of causing trouble. In fact, I would much rather avoid trouble. You're the one stirring and I cba with it. Fuck this.

I would strongly suggest answering the question correctly next time if you're not looking for trouble.

Jordan, he was answering the question, just not in the way you wanted. You asked the question, you have to be prepared for the answers you'll get. We don't need this back and forth crap going on in general discussion as well to prove who is more right. Can't everyone just agree to disagree, there is no need to become aggressive.

The question is just so...Broad. You can't say lets kill cows just taking an unrealistic perspective on it, because without cows we won't have milk, leading to no iron, probably deficiencies and humans eventually being wiped out. The same with this question. If we make a finer world, there will be sacrifices. If we eliminate crime totally, it will change people in general. Its their free will (unfortunately) to decide to kill someone or something. Sometime like that will always be existent, as its always going to be existent within humans.

I'm not trying to be cynical or anything, but if someone said something like (more water), we would probably end up being flooded cuz we wouldn't have anywhere productive to put the amount of water they asked for, except in the ocean.

It wasn't supposed to be thought out in realistic train of thought. Broad? No, it wasn't. It was very specific. It was pure fantasy. Injecting in realism into a place where it wasn't needed was perceived an insult. He 'answered' but he 'answered' outside the question. I told him that a billion times. I said my peace with him. You're a little late.