The top 5 reasons why WWE sucks

#5. Wrestlers having 430734574508748 title reigns in such a short period
of time. Does guys like Edge, Cena, HHH, Orton REALLY need 8-10 title
reigns in 4-5 years? The answer is simple, no...they dont.

#4.
The WWE Universe and their ignorant fanbase. This one made the list
because their fans refuse to accept the fact that the product sucks, or
they bitch about EVERYTHING. Lets take a look at who gets pushed shall
we? When Sheamus won the title the first time, everyone complained that
"it was too soon and Cena should be champ cause HE NEVER GIVES UP AND HE
NEVER QUITS." Then Cena won the belt back and everyone
complained...then Tista won it and the fanboys cried that Cena wasnt
champ. Now the fanboys are pissed because Miz is champ, and a good champ
at that. People are afraid of change, and it shows through various
posts on forums.

#3. The tag team division. I know i shitted on
TNAs division, but WWE...lol doesnt have one period. As soon as Santino
and Kozlov lose the titles, Kozlov turns heel, im calling that right
now.

#2. Not signing divas that can wrestle. Marks say the
current crop of divas can wrestle, but thats a fucking joke. They have
3.....THREE that are more talented than the rest of the roster combined:
Natalya, Beth Phoenix and Gail Kim

#1. John Cena hogging the spotlight and Triple H being the 2nd in command....god help us all.

I agree on all of them. But that ain't gonna stop me following.

Vengenz wrote:

If WWE sucks, then why are you here?

because theres something called pointing out somethings flaws

I havent seen an issue with HHH being in charge yet. he isnt on tv...he isnt holding gold. i dont see the problem.


Cena needs to take a short jump off a tall cliff.

HHH doesn't need to be on tv to be in charge, he's Vinces 2nd in command remember?

Yeah but we've known he's Vince's right hand man for years...since marrying Stephanie. People complain he's on tv too much and holding gold too much but he probably wont be doing that if he's the guy behind the scenes. plus he's got 3 girls and he's getting older.

Personally I think HHH has a better mind for business than Stephanie...so i'm ok with WWE being in his hands.

Kane wrote:

HHH doesn't need to be on tv to be in charge, he's Vinces 2nd in command remember?

He's fought for more wrestling-oriented material behind the scenes but Vince has shut him down every time. Be mad at someone, be mad at Vince, he has the ultimate say in everything, not HHH.

The reason why he was pushed as he was the last few years was because they lost Rock and Austin, Taker went to SD!, and HHH was the only top Attitude guy that could still go along with HBK but yet everyone disses him for being up front in the camera all the time....it's just business, they had NOBODY ELSE to carry the company in the role he had in it the last batch of years.

He's slowly going into retirement, he helped put over Sheamus' ginger ass (lol) and is slowly fazing himself out of screen time permenently. So why be mad at him still? Makes no sense. Oh yeah that's right, he's the son-in-law.

Vengenz wrote:

Kane wrote:

Vengenz wrote:

If WWE sucks, then why are you here?

because theres something called pointing out somethings flaws

What's that going to do for you?

It's a waste of time.

Discussing something on a discussion forum is bad? Good call Vee

I STILL HATE NATTIE, she sucks to me. She lacks carisma. MEH

How did I know you were posting these topics? lol, the reasons are good, but the explanations are piss poor.

They let McCool actually so stuff so she's up there too.

#4 pisses me off because guys like Booker T, Edge, RVD, etc should've been winning world titles at least ONCE during 2001-4. Yet they just throw the title on the Miz and Sheamus so soon, even considering Wade Barrett. Sheamus has grown on me now because he has been here a while, not winning titles after ONE raw match.

to be fair, the Miz has been around since 2005....so this was a good enough time