Should Undertaker remain undefeated at Wrestlemania or lose b4 he retires.

We all know undertaker is getting up there age-wise and I just wanted to get everyones thoughts, Do ya'll think Undertaker should retire undefeated at Wrestlemania or should he lose his last WM match before he retires, whenever that is, and "pass the torch" at the grandest stage of them all.

I say, he should remain undefeated.

He should remain undefeated. I know he will be passing the tourch if he doesnt but that streak is a part of him and it sets him apart from everyone else.

It is a part of his history.

yeah, but itll also put whoever beats him into the spotlight for years to come. say DiBiase or someone who has the talent to be a major player in the next coming years. but i doubt Taker will retire with a blemish on his record

It's his thing.. Taker' needs to remain undefeated. If he was going to lose to anyone, it should have been Michaels.. it wasn't Michaels, so no, he should remain undefeated and be known as the man who remained undefeated at Wrestlemania, the grandest stage of them all, his entire career. It's something he is/will be remembered for.

Like ppl have said WHOEVER beats him at Mania, if used correctly would certainly become a Main player almost instantly....so if they were to defeat it, i would say let someone like a Dibiase or a MVP or whoever to beat him
But id rather he was undefeated

It's a hard choice tbh.

It would be good if he lost to an up and coming star has a way to pass the torch. Someone who actually has a future in the main events and not just some main eventer. Have them retire his wm streak and then get a push for the title.

On the other hand it could hurt Takers legacy. That is what a lot of people remember him for, and if he lost it he wouldnt be has special

Two words:

Fuck. No.

Angelwilliamsfan wrote:

It's a hard choice tbh.

It would be good if he lost to an up and coming star has a way to pass the torch. Someone who actually has a future in the main events and not just some main eventer. Have them retire his wm streak and then get a push for the title.

On the other hand it could hurt Takers legacy. That is what a lot of people remember him for, and if he lost it he wouldnt be has special

will it hurt his legacy? maybe. will it outright destroy it? no. even though the streak is a big part of his career, he'll be known for other things, like being in WWE for a few decades, putting younger talent over when asked to etc

Chessman wrote:

Angelwilliamsfan wrote:

It's a hard choice tbh.

It would be good if he lost to an up and coming star has a way to pass the torch. Someone who actually has a future in the main events and not just some main eventer. Have them retire his wm streak and then get a push for the title.

On the other hand it could hurt Takers legacy. That is what a lot of people remember him for, and if he lost it he wouldnt be has special

will it hurt his legacy? maybe. will it outright destroy it? no. even though the streak is a big part of his career, he'll be known for other things, like being in WWE for a few decades, putting younger talent over when asked to etc

has i said hurt, not destory. plus if he comes back for one time only matches which is a possiblity since most wwe legends do and its at wm they wouldnt be able to keep saying he was undefeated.

Okay, Sarcy is back with a few more words..

Sarcy thinks that he SHOULD retire with his streak cuz Sarcy is so fucking sick of that whole "passing the torch" bull. Seriously, that only works when a guy passing it is at the end of his career and the other dude is at his peak and/or is at an equal level of awesomeness. No one will ever come close to Taker's legacy and Sarcy doubts adding "Well, he beat the fucking Undertaker at Wrestlemania!" would add any extra to said wrestler.

Angelwilliamsfan wrote:

Chessman wrote:

Angelwilliamsfan wrote:

It's a hard choice tbh.

It would be good if he lost to an up and coming star has a way to pass the torch. Someone who actually has a future in the main events and not just some main eventer. Have them retire his wm streak and then get a push for the title.

On the other hand it could hurt Takers legacy. That is what a lot of people remember him for, and if he lost it he wouldnt be has special

will it hurt his legacy? maybe. will it outright destroy it? no. even though the streak is a big part of his career, he'll be known for other things, like being in WWE for a few decades, putting younger talent over when asked to etc

has i said hurt, not destory. plus if he comes back for one time only matches which is a possiblity since most wwe legends do and its at wm they wouldnt be able to keep saying he was undefeated.

after he retires, i dont think he'll do one time only matches

really? i think he will, i see taker coming back and doing atleast 2 more matches

i dont think he should ever lose it... it's one of the consistent things to look forward to, come WM time.

^ its also the easiest pickem EVER

LL "THE GREAT" wrote:

^ its also the easiest pickem EVER

Good one!