Should WWE have had Taker's streak go on for so long?

Should WWE have had Taker Streak go on for so long?

If no, then which of his past WM opponents should have beaten him?

Discuss.

They should leave him undefeated.

I think it's cool that he has that streak and he definitely deserves to have it til he retires

YES He should have the streak, hes the only one with it, it sets him apart from everyone else and its what he is known for.

he wanted the streak to be ended twice...both times to Kane. Kane declined both times

CM Dead, Your Savior wrote:

he wanted the streak to be ended twice...both times to Kane. Kane declined both times

Really? I heard that in his contract it says he can't lose the streak. Whether that's true or not I don't know but that's the rumor going around

^
I haven't heard that before, but, I have heard about Kane declining, though.

Where did you hear this?

I think Kane at WM 14 should have defeated him...Kane was just so dominant back then.

You know, when I look back at the ending to his match with Giant Gonzalez, he probably should've lost that match. Instead it ended in dq because when GG was pwning Taker's ass, the ref told him to back stop because he was on the ropes in the corner. That match was so short and lame!

I doubt that WWF ever intended for Taker to have a streak it just sorta happened.

Yeah, because who knew he'd even be in the company this long. But you'd think that there was a potential opponent somewhere in there that creative would book for him to lose somehow. That's sports enetertainment for ya.

Anybody Taker faced at Mania should have won, idc who, just anyone.

Well, to note, RVD is still undefeated at WrestleMania.

RVD vs Taker at WMXXVII!

Shame Taker's rumoured to be retiring and RVD's with TNA.

haha yeah, it would be funny if RVD ended Taker's streak of all people.

lol