TNA In Talks With Ex-WWE Diva

TNA Wrestling officials have had discussions with former WWE performer Serena Deeb in regards to joining the organization.

well WWE gave her multiple warnings....so in the end it was her stupidity that got her fired. Of course TNA would jump on the chance to snatch her up. I wonder what kind of gimmick she'd get though.

This does not surprise me. When she was interviewed for the Women of Wrestling podcast, she would not say anything about TNA. They specifically asked her if she would be interested in going to TNA and her response was something like I can't talk about it at this time.

King Silva wrote:

Good.

So I guess it isn't a rumor anymore.

She would be a good addition.

Stupid wwe released her so their stupidity is tna's gain.

yes, because she was supposed to stick to her kayfable angle and didnt makes WWE look stupid. by that logic, its WWEs fault Mickie James was partying it up and ended up being released

it was reported why she was fired. WWE wanted her to stick to her "straight edge persona", you dont want someone whos preaching to kids on TV to stay sober then turn around and go get drunk the next day. not sad at all really

King Silva wrote:

^ I never really knew why she was fired.

So it was because she was getting hammered and she really had to act straight edge?

Kinda sad but whatever...

It is pretty sad, also pretty sad that people believe every single thing they read on sites. I'd rather hear Serena's side of the story, not sure if she's spoke about it yet.

Queen Mintz wrote:

King Silva wrote:

^ I never really knew why she was fired.

So it was because she was getting hammered and she really had to act straight edge?

Kinda sad but whatever...

It is pretty sad, also pretty sad that people believe every single thing they read on sites. I'd rather hear Serena's side of the story, not sure if she's spoke about it yet.

It's Sad people believe every single thing people say...because no one in this world lies. Serena don't know why she got fired, the only person who knows, is the person who made the call. So even IF Serena spoke out about it. SHE still doesn't know why she got released because THEY ALL get the same story:

"Creativly we have nothing for you to do" OR "We've decided creativly to take another direction"

So I don't know how Serena could speak out on her release, i could imagine her talking about how much they warned her because, we all talk about how we messed things up for ourselves

Well according to you no one lies on the sites but when the superstars/divas clear something up they're the ones who are the liars. In this case I would believe Serena over sites because most of the time they either make shit up or they make things worse than they really are.

Either way it was stupid to get rid of her since she was a great addition to the women's roster and now we're still stuck with idiots who can't wrestle. Those are the ones who should be getting released

Queen Mintz wrote:

Well according to you no one lies on the sites but when the superstars/divas clear something up they're the ones who are the liars.

I'm not saying the news sites DON'T LIE...but i DO believe...to every story there is a grain of salt of truth. Even if it is made into this whole big story, there is 0.001% of truth to it. Because even books are written out of some glimmer of truth.

And I Don't believe EVERYTHING the superstars/divas say because....If i was thrown in Jail for punching an old lady and stealing her dog...I won't say "The truth is, I punched her and stole her dog".....my story would be "The woman was a bad owner and mistreated her dog, when i tried to save it, she attacked me with her cane and i hand no choice but to push her away and try to save the dog"

NO ONE is going to write negative press about themselves...NOBODY, not even the most cold harted killer.

So Serena might make her story pretty and completly blame WWE for everything, and you will take her word for it, because it came out of her mouth.

But WWE management DON'T discuss their firing and hirings to the public. What if SHE WAS wrong, but they aren't allowed to discuss these in public? I guess because Serena flourished her story, does it mean she is right?

I'm not telling you you are wrong...but you can't take either sides as 100% of the truth, because no story will EVER contain 100% of the truth, especially if it makes you look bad.

I'm not argueing, just try to understand what i'm saying