Kane vs Taker

I'm sure that things are going to lead to both of them facing off against eachother (maybe at Mania?) who knows at this point, but my question is, should Kane retain against Taker when they face off or should he drop the strap to his brother? Assuming the title is on the line when they eventually face off.

IF the title is on the line. id LOVE for Kane to at least defend it once

like i was saying before...Keep Kane as champ up until SSeries.
Have Kane defeat Taker in a Hell in a Cell match ...at Hell in a Cell
then have Taker win against Kane in a casket match at SSeries.

if that happens Kane can have a nice decent reign of 4 months, and he actually gets to defend it a few times...and Kane NEVER or very rarely gets wins over Taker.

a lot of ppl are a bit "sigh" with the fued...i dont really see why. this fued is just as history based as fueds between Hogan and Flair, HHH and HBK, Austin and Stone Cold, Cena and Orton...Kane v Taker is another fued that has been continuous on and off for 13 years....i think its only fitting that Kane and maybe even Taker retire after one last battle

I couldn't stomach another Kane vs. Taker match. I hope they can just be the BOD but not a full blown team, just an alliance.

I hope they have a match at NOC, Kane retains. At hell in the cell they have a HITC match, Kane retains again. Kane v Taker is built up then at Survivor Series they have the casket match and Taker takes it then. I want a full on feud with them 2.

I would like that Janine, if there was a way, I would love for this to drag on until WM! But that won't happen especially with the lazies on creative!

really i dont see it either...i mean your asking a fued to be dragged on for nearlly 9 months!

what could happen. Kane could lose the title at SSeries.....give Kane a RRumble win...and if Taker aint champion...have Kane do something no one has ever done...and refuse to face a champion...and instead choose to face Taker one last time....either putting his career or Takers career online as wel

Waaaaait a MINUTE! Please give me something better than Kane would be Undertaker's assaulter. How many times do we need to see these two face with Kane as the heel and getting pwned by Taker in the end?!

Another go-round with these two would be lame, but if Kane is heel then it's pointless, in essence.

i do get what your saying

Taker has never been the heel....and Kane has never won the fued

it is boring

but as i said, it such a storied feud that the potential for more elements to it would be great

although id rather that attacker was someone other then Kane aswell tbh...hopefully WWE realize even the dumbest of kids can see this coming.

The LL Father wrote:

i do get what your saying

Taker has never been the heel....and Kane has never won the fued

it is boring

but as i said, it such a storied feud that the potential for more elements to it would be great

although id rather that attacker was someone other then Kane aswell tbh...hopefully WWE realize even the dumbest of kids can see this coming.

Potential is only that in today's WWE... potential. WWE Management has a habit of turning things that are going perfectly well into the perfect disaster. They never fail to do that - ala NXT invasion angle. It's kinda messy at the moment, granted, it's still intriguing.

again i agree
although i am not interested at all in the Nexus angle