Velvet Sky or Kelly Kelly?

Who is more suited to be champion? Why do you think so?

Velvet. Less of a Barbie. Has more substance to her character. Equally as crappy in the ring, but better on the mic. Has more experience and is doing well for herself during this push.

Agree with most of the above. Wrestling wise maybe Kelly slightly has the edge but Velvet is more interesting, very good on the mic and can play a bitchy heel or underdog face very well.

Velvet hasn't only grown in the ring, but as a character an entertainer and a performer.

I despise velvet, i hated her, especially since she had this whoring style about her, had no class whatsoever. the ONLY time i enjoyed her is when she was tagging with April Hunter because April was teaching her how to be provocetive and sexy without being a complete whore.

But even April hunter couldn't give her some class

BUT at the end of the day, she has grown, not that i like her, but she's out there and doing what she can. Not that Kelly isn't but, Kelly just grew in the ring, she hasn't made much growth outside of that.....while Velvet, has really grown in all area's.

i like them both for different reasons. Kelly i always liked and she definitely had something that set her apart from the other generic girls on the roster and she has worked very hard to improve in the ring and make herself must-see. the last couple of times we've seen her on commentary she's been very natural and able to bounce off the others well

Velvet i never used to like but it was the feud with Sarita and the eventual split of the Beautiful People that made me a fan. she's become quite good in the ring and she oozes charisma. i want her to become Knockouts Champion but i'd rather it happens in a singles match instead of a Fatal 4 Way

Kelly Kelly all the way.Velvet looks like a cheap ho from downtown.And if she looks like a ho,acts like a ho,then she must be a ho.

Knowledge of the Game wrote:

Velvet. Less of a Barbie. Has more substance to her character. Equally as crappy in the ring, but better on the mic. Has more experience and is doing well for herself during this push.

I think this sums it up completely. Both of them are way too over with the crowd despite being horrid wrestlers. I think they both have the same kind of look, with Velvet a little more on the cheap side. However, I think Velvet has an actual character where Kelly Kelly is just a very generic blonde.

omg really? your gonna pull that card, cause throughout vel's career she's been with two guys, kelly...um batsita, justin, test, and apperently more due to what randy said. So um calling velvet a hoe is just ignorant and stupid cause thats like the pot calling the kettle black. sorry dude, nice try though :D

oh and before anyone gets into that, im NOT huge vel fan i dont like her much, but saying velvet is a ho and kelly isnt, that's just dumb .

And Kelly might be a ho I can agree with that but I dont really care what she does backstage all I care about is what she does in the ring.And I never really said Velvet was a Ho I just said that the way she looks and dress makes her look like a ho.

her attire is fine, kelly comes to the ring in bra and short short shorts, dont go there man, just shhh

DrizzyDrakeFan wrote:

And Kelly might be a ho I can agree with that but I dont really care what she does backstage all I care about is what she does in the ring.And I never really said Velvet was a Ho I just said that the way she looks and dress makes her look like a ho.

Face. Frickin'. Palm.

You know what whatever I dont really care right now Im all ready pissed off so It Is What it is.

Velvet Sky, because she's been wrestling in the independent circuit and she loves wrestling.

see i say Velvet.

i agree with Shimmer Mark in that they are way to over then they should be. However i think with Velvet the reason she was over was because she was able to get a gimmick/character immediately. Since when she debuted in TNA she immediately was put with Angelina, and TBP was born....and they were a great duo and worked hard and deserved the fan reactions they got.

Kelly on the other hand is a total enigma, I mean sure she is hot. But i really do think her looks are overrated, I have seen far better looking women on this planet....and these are women from England FFS.

As for my reasons for choosing Velvet. It really does come down to her charisma and character. But to defend Kelly slightly, Velvet is in TNA, where they TRY with their divas. I mean in since the KO's devision was born only two diva's have had any sort of attention like the knockouts get. And thats Layla and McCool!

Attire should not at all have been a factor in choosing which diva is better suited as champion. So WHOEVER first mentioned attire...drop it. that has nothing to do with anything. it shouldnt have even been brought up.

now...let's stay on topic and keep this thread clean or else i just start handing out bans. Geez!
---

My vote goes to Velvet since she has a character and imo she is slightly better in the ring. Kelly is the generic blond face...a stale boring gimmick that any blond diva can (and probably has) pull off..